Back to projects
Hardware/Electronics DevelopmentAudio TestAcousticsMusic Streaming
Aether Cone
Audio test and validation for premium WiFi music player with focus on high-fidelity acoustic performance
Problem
Premium audio products require meticulous validation to deliver high-fidelity sound that matches audiophile expectations. The Aether Cone WiFi music player needed to compete with high-end speakers while maintaining simplicity and modern connectivity.
Validation challenges:
- Frequency response must be flat across audible range (20Hz–20kHz)
- Distortion must be minimal even at high SPL (audiophile standards)
- Acoustic design must minimize resonances and port noise
- WiFi/Bluetooth streaming must maintain bit-perfect audio quality
Approach
Led audio validation for Aether Cone, focusing on:
- Acoustic characterization: frequency response, THD, IMD, max SPL
- Streaming audio quality: verify bit-perfect playback (no compression artifacts)
- Acoustic integration: cabinet resonances, port tuning, driver matching
- Subjective listening: validate objective measurements correlate with perceived quality
Test Strategy:
- Define audio requirements based on competitive analysis (premium speaker benchmarks)
- Build test methods for acoustic measurements (anechoic chamber protocols)
- Create listening test protocols (ABX testing, critical listening panels)
- Coordinate with industrial design team on acoustic implications of enclosure design
What I Built
Test Infrastructure:
- Anechoic chamber test setup (APx analyzer, measurement microphones, positioning system)
- THD+N measurement system (distortion analysis across frequency and SPL)
- Streaming audio validation rig (bit-comparison testing for WiFi/Bluetooth)
- Port resonance detection system (microphone arrays, spectral analysis)
Documentation:
- Audio test plan with requirements traceability (competitive benchmarks → test cases)
- Test case library (frequency response, distortion, max SPL, streaming quality)
- Acoustic design feedback (enclosure resonances, port tuning recommendations)
- Manufacturing acceptance criteria (tolerance bands for production validation)
Validation Process:
- EVT (Engineering Validation Test): confirm acoustic design meets targets
- DVT: validate production-intent design across environmental conditions
- Build validation: ensure manufacturing consistency across units
- Subjective listening: critical listening panels with audio engineers and musicians
Architecture
Diagram placeholder: Aether Cone → Anechoic Chamber → APx Analyzer → Frequency Response / THD / SPL
Aether Cone (DUT) in Anechoic Chamber
↓
Measurement Microphones (calibrated, positioned)
↓
APx Audio Analyzer
├─ Frequency Response (20Hz–20kHz sweep)
├─ THD+N (distortion analysis)
├─ IMD (intermodulation distortion)
└─ Max SPL (before limiting/clipping)
↓
Python Scripts (compare to spec, generate reports)
↓
Results Database (trending, unit-to-unit variation)
Outcomes
Qualitative Impact:
- Delivered audio validation that enabled product launch into competitive premium market
- Identified acoustic design issue (port resonance at 80Hz) before mass production
- Built test methods that transferred to manufacturing (QA acceptance testing)
- Validated bit-perfect streaming (no audio quality degradation over WiFi)
What worked well:
- Anechoic measurements provided objective data to guide acoustic tuning
- Subjective listening tests caught issues objective metrics didn't capture (e.g., transient response)
- Industrial design collaboration prevented late-stage enclosure changes (acoustic implications caught early)
Challenges:
- Anechoic chamber availability limited test throughput (single shared resource)
- Subjective listening is time-consuming and requires trained listeners (not scalable)
- Manufacturing tolerance bands needed multiple iterations (balance quality vs. yield)
Learnings
- Balance objective + subjective: measurements guide design, but ears make final call
- Coordinate with industrial design: enclosure shape/materials have major acoustic impact
- Define tolerance bands early: manufacturing consistency requires clear acceptance criteria
- Benchmark competitors: know the target performance before starting validation